Why Aren't There More Girls In Leadership Roles? - Anita

• Have you acknowledged that dominant males in your local community, or even of higher position and leadership rank, may possess the more significant roles of leading others? In other words, do you believe that capable women are not being encouraged appropriately due to blinding gender stereotypes? We can prove that talented and skillful men and women are both equally trained to carry the overwhelming weight of their dependent community upon their powerful shoulders, but why do we consistently discover that our male counterparts seem to prevail over us and somehow win the leadership roles of our homes, neighborhoods, and even governments. Since the beginning of possessing an ordered system of leadership, sophisticated women have been noticeably blocked from pursuing these leadership positions primarily due to their cultural limits. But do these usually confident women also hold back?
• This entire complicated debate immediately began when a simple school student writer, Katharine Q. Seeyle, attending Phillips Andover Academy, addressed the noticible amount of gender inequality brewing in her extremely aged, 235-year-old prep school. When she observed all the various leadership positions in her professional academy, she immediately became angered and attempted to force her fellow classmates to at least acknowledge these pressing matters. She purposely wrote a detailed and raging letter to the esteemed school newspaper, The Phillipian, and in the obvious manner that most controversial issues began, she ignited the simple match and sent another raging fire throughout the entire campus. While as usual with these doubtful debates, while many supported the primary idea of gender inequality, others depended on the idea of male dominance in leadership roles for their own selfish reasons.
• The primary cause of this entire raging gender debacle immediately began when the esteemed academy's official election began on Wednesday, mainly concerning which fortunate student would earn the top leadership position of the president of the entire school. Monitoring the overall statistics of the previous elections, the students were capable of observing that since the astounding year of 1973 to 2003, only four females were reluctantly selected for the profound leadership  position, 2003 being the most recent. The accompanying top position, as in editor in chief of the amazing school newspaper, was also calculated to possess thirty-three males and nine females. The people who quickly sent the raging letter to the newspaper also acknowledged that this was a everlasting shame upon the school publically, and even commented that younger females would have a small amount of leadership role models for girls.
• Through this gender inequality displayed at the amazing school, the letter writers infere that the school was somewhat biased and maybe intentionally followed the inequality displayed in our average societies for generations and generations. This is blindly comparing the structure of the entire school's profound system to one of the primary issues that plague our communities and the hierarchy of power and ultimate leadership. When the headmaster was interviewed for his personal opinion on the pressing issue and the controversy, the raging debate throughout his entire campus. He simply replied that since this is an average issue in our common society, common sense leads us to believe this would an average issue in the society of the campus. He also allows and permits this to occur because he claims that this is the average issues that along with Phillip Andover, other praised academies must deal constantly.
• Even though this arguably major situation was not clearly acknowledged and fixed properly by the overall staff and the previously wise headmaster, the inspirational letter writers were capable of majorly changing the entire odds of the significant election. Instead of the common, untampered rules, they switched from electing a single president to two co-presidents. Therefore, different candidates were forced to form various teams and run the election process together. While a surprising majority of the candidates formed teams including both genders in equality, some teams continued to be general and formed completely male teams. This was somewhat successful, as it took the silent students and annual voters by extreme surprise and caused the tide of the ocean of male leadership an dominance to change significantly. Now, in the finals, stands a prominent combined gender teams and a complete male team.